Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
how to block magnetic field

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
Proteck'd Apparel  for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In  https://lycrawoman2.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/03/22/preventing-electromagnetic-fields-employing-clothes/  of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.